Wright v Information Commissioner & Anor [2023] UKFTT 758 (GRC) (13 September 2023)
The tribunal has no jurisdiction under section 166 DPA 1998 to consider challenges to the substantive outcome of a complaint or to the adequacy of reasons already given; the application is an attempt to use section 166 to achieve a different complaint outcome, which is not permitted.
- Citation
- [2023] UKFTT 758 (GRC)
- Parties
- Applicant: David Wright; Respondent: The Information Commissioner
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 13 September 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Section 166 DPA 1998 Application / Strike Out Application Decided at Preliminary Stage
- Outcome
- Application struck out
- Legal Topics
- Section 166 Data Protection Act 1998, Legal Professional Privilege, Tribunal Jurisdiction, Adequacy of Reasons
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
David Wright
Applicant
The Information Commissioner
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Section 166 DPA 1998 Application / Strike Out Application Decided at Preliminary Stage
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the tribunal has jurisdiction under section 166 DPA 1998 to consider a challenge to the substantive outcome of a complaint
- 2 Whether the Information Commissioner failed to take appropriate steps in responding to the complaint, specifically by providing inadequate reasons
Ratio Decidendi
The tribunal has no jurisdiction under section 166 DPA 1998 to consider challenges to the substantive outcome of a complaint or to the adequacy of reasons already given; the application is an attempt to use section 166 to achieve a different complaint outcome, which is not permitted.
Court Disposition
Application struck out
Orders
- The application under section 166 of the Data Protection Act 1998 is struck out.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment