Inter IKEA Systems B.V. v Dazzle Junior Couture (Full Decision _Transfer) [2017] DRS 19341 (21 November 2017)

Inter IKEA Systems B.V. v Dazzle Junior Couture (Full Decision _Transfer) [2017] DRS 19341 (21 November 2017)

The panel found that the domain name was confusingly similar to the complainant's trademark, the respondent had no rights or legitimate interests, and the domain name was registered and used in bad faith.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2017] DRS 19341
Parties
Complainant: Inter IKEA Systems B. V.; Respondent: Dazzle Junior Couture
Jurisdiction
United Kingdom
Judgment Date
21 November 2017
Procedural Posture
Domain Name Dispute / Full Decision
Outcome
Complaint upheld
Legal Topics
Trademark Infringement, Domain Name Transfer
Intellectual Property Domain Name Law Trademark Infringement Domain Name Transfer

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Inter IKEA Systems B. V.

Complainant

Dazzle Junior Couture

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Domain Name Dispute / Full Decision

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the domain name is identical or similar to a trademark in which the complainant has rights
  2. 2 Whether the respondent has rights or legitimate interests in respect of the domain name
  3. 3 Whether the domain name was registered or is being used in bad faith

Ratio Decidendi

The panel found that the domain name was confusingly similar to the complainant's trademark, the respondent had no rights or legitimate interests, and the domain name was registered and used in bad faith.

Court Disposition

Complaint upheld

Orders

  • The domain name is to be transferred to the complainant