Canterbury Skin And Laser Clinic Ltd Dr. Mark Hudson-Peacock v Dean Abrahamse T/a Labrahamse (Full Decision _Transfer) [2012] DRS 10619 (20 February 2012)

Canterbury Skin And Laser Clinic Ltd Dr. Mark Hudson-Peacock v Dean Abrahamse T/a Labrahamse (Full Decision _Transfer) [2012] DRS 10619 (20 February 2012)

The Panel found that the complainant had rights in the name and that the respondent's registration of the domain name was abusive under the DRS Policy.

Citation
[2012] DRS 10619
Parties
Complainant: Canterbury Skin And Laser Clinic Ltd; Complainant: Dr. Mark Hudson-Peacock; Respondent: Dean Abrahamse T/a Labrahamse
Jurisdiction
United Kingdom
Judgment Date
20 February 2012
Procedural Posture
Domain Name Dispute / Full Decision
Outcome
transfer ordered
Legal Topics
Domain Name Dispute, Trademark Infringement
Intellectual Property Internet Law Domain Name Dispute Trademark Infringement

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Canterbury Skin And Laser Clinic Ltd

Complainant

Dr. Mark Hudson-Peacock

Complainant

Dean Abrahamse T/a Labrahamse

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Domain Name Dispute / Full Decision

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the respondent's registration of the domain name was abusive
  2. 2 Whether the complainant has rights in a name or mark which is identical or similar to the domain name

Ratio Decidendi

The Panel found that the complainant had rights in the name and that the respondent's registration of the domain name was abusive under the DRS Policy.

Court Disposition

transfer ordered

Orders

  • The domain name is to be transferred to the complainant.