Miss H Anderson v Debenhams Retail plc (England and Wales : Public Interest Disclosure : Unlawful Deduction from Wages) [2017] UKET 1801304/2017 (26 October 2017)
The tribunal found that the claimant was subjected to unlawful deduction from wages and that she made a protected disclosure, entitling her to remedies under the relevant statutes.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2017] UKET 1801304/2017
- Parties
- Claimant: Miss H Anderson; Respondent: Debenhams Retail plc
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 26 October 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Tribunal / Judgment
- Outcome
- Claim upheld
- Legal Topics
- Public Interest Disclosure, Unlawful Deduction From Wages
Employment Law Public Interest Disclosure Unlawful Deduction From Wages
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Parties
Miss H Anderson
Claimant
Debenhams Retail plc
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Tribunal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the claimant was subjected to unlawful deduction from wages
- 2 Whether the claimant made a protected disclosure under public interest disclosure provisions
Ratio Decidendi
The tribunal found that the claimant was subjected to unlawful deduction from wages and that she made a protected disclosure, entitling her to remedies under the relevant statutes.
Court Disposition
Claim upheld
Orders
- Respondent to pay the claimant the amount unlawfully deducted from wages
- Respondent to provide remedies for detriment suffered as a result of protected disclosure
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment