Mr I Bell v Decidebloom Ltd T/a Stoneacre (England and Wales : Age Discrimination) [2021] UKET 2603611/2020 (16 March 2021)
The tribunal found that the claimant had not established facts from which it could conclude that age discrimination had occurred, and the respondent provided a credible non-discriminatory reason for dismissal.
- Citation
- [2021] UKET 2603611/2020
- Parties
- Claimant: Mr I Bell; Respondent: Decidebloom Ltd T/a Stoneacre
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 16 March 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Tribunal / Judgment
- Outcome
- Claim dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Age Discrimination, Unfair Dismissal
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Parties
Mr I Bell
Claimant
Decidebloom Ltd T/a Stoneacre
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Tribunal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the claimant was subjected to age discrimination by the respondent
- 2 Whether the claimant was unfairly dismissed
Ratio Decidendi
The tribunal found that the claimant had not established facts from which it could conclude that age discrimination had occurred, and the respondent provided a credible non-discriminatory reason for dismissal.
Court Disposition
Claim dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment