Denbrae Ltd v Revenue & Customs [2010] UKFTT 195 (TC) (28 April 2010)
The legal fees incurred by the Appellant were not for the purpose of its economic activities but to protect and recover assets. There was no direct and immediate link between the input tax claimed and any taxable supplies. Therefore, the input tax was not deductible.
- Citation
- [2010] UKFTT 195
- Parties
- Appellant: Denbrae Limited; Respondents: The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 28 April 2010
- Procedural Posture
- VAT Input Tax Appeal / First Tier Tribunal (tax), Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Input Tax Deduction, Attribution of Input Tax, Economic Activity, Litigation Costs
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Denbrae Limited
Appellant
The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs
Respondents
Procedural Posture
VAT Input Tax Appeal / First Tier Tribunal (tax), Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether input tax incurred on legal fees relating to action against previous directors is attributable to taxable supplies made by the Appellant
- 2 Whether there was a direct and immediate link between the input tax and taxable supplies
- 3 Whether the Investrand BV principle applies
Ratio Decidendi
The legal fees incurred by the Appellant were not for the purpose of its economic activities but to protect and recover assets. There was no direct and immediate link between the input tax claimed and any taxable supplies. Therefore, the input tax was not deductible.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Notice of Amendment to Assessment dated 25 November 2005 confirmed
- Refusal to repay voluntary disclosure dated 5 October 2006 confirmed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment