Madden v Revenue & Customs (INCOME TAX/CORPORATION TAX : Assessment/self-assessment) [2018] UKFTT 414 (TC) (26 July 2018)
The Tribunal found that HMRC had discharged the burden of proof for the discovery assessments and penalties, given the appellant's admissions in the COP9 process, failure to cooperate, and lack of credible evidence to displace HMRC's estimates. The assessments and penalties were upheld as reasonable and justified based on the available evidence and statutory framework.
- Citation
- [2018] UKFTT 414 (TC)
- Parties
- Appellant: Denis Madden; Respondents: The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 26 July 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Income Tax Self Assessment Appeal / First Tier Tribunal (tax) Substantive Decision
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Income Tax, Self Assessment, Tax Fraud, Discovery Assessments, Penalty Determinations, Time Limits for Assessments, Onus of Proof, Quantum of Assessments
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Denis Madden
Appellant
The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Income Tax Self Assessment Appeal / First Tier Tribunal (tax) Substantive Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether HMRC's discovery assessments and closure notices for 2003-04 to 2013-14 stand good
- 2 Whether penalties for negligent and deliberate conduct are justified
- 3 Whether penalty reductions for disclosure were sufficient
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal found that HMRC had discharged the burden of proof for the discovery assessments and penalties, given the appellant's admissions in the COP9 process, failure to cooperate, and lack of credible evidence to displace HMRC's estimates. The assessments and penalties were upheld as reasonable and justified based on the available evidence and statutory framework.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- All discovery assessments, closure notices, and penalty determinations/assessments for 2003-04 to 2013-14 stand good as issued and/or revised on review.
- No further reduction or mitigation of penalties is warranted.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment