Mr S Hopkin v Dermal Diagnostics Innovation (England and Wales : Redundancy) [2026] UKET 3300397/2025 (9 February 2026)
The Tribunal found that a genuine redundancy situation existed but the respondent failed to follow a fair procedure, rendering the dismissal unfair.
- Citation
- [2026] UKET 3300397/2025
- Parties
- Claimant: Mr S Hopkin; Respondent: Dermal Diagnostics Innovation
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 09 February 2026
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Tribunal / Judgment
- Outcome
- Claim upheld in part
- Legal Topics
- Redundancy, Unfair Dismissal
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Parties
Mr S Hopkin
Claimant
Dermal Diagnostics Innovation
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Tribunal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the claimant was unfairly dismissed by reason of redundancy
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal found that a genuine redundancy situation existed but the respondent failed to follow a fair procedure, rendering the dismissal unfair.
Court Disposition
Claim upheld in part
Orders
- The respondent is ordered to pay compensation to the claimant for unfair dismissal.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment