Devon Hewey (Appellant) v The Queen (Respondent) (Bermuda)
The judge's directions to the jury on the significance of one-component and two-component particles were erroneous and not supported by expert evidence, reversing the burden of proof and inflating the probative value of neutral evidence; these misdirections likely influenced the jury and caused a substantial miscarriage of justice.
- Citation
- [2022] UKPC 12
- Parties
- Appellant: Devon Hewey; Respondent: The Queen
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 11 April 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal to Privy Council
- Outcome
- Conviction and sentence set aside; matter remitted to Court of Appeal to consider retrial.
- Legal Topics
- Admissibility of Expert Evidence, Gunshot Residue, Misdirection, Burden of Proof, Retrial
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Devon Hewey
Appellant
The Queen
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal to Privy Council
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether evidence of one-component and two-component particles should have been admitted at trial
- 2 Whether the trial judge's directions to the jury on particle evidence were inaccurate, imbalanced, and unfair
- 3 Whether misdirections caused a substantial miscarriage of justice
Ratio Decidendi
The judge's directions to the jury on the significance of one-component and two-component particles were erroneous and not supported by expert evidence, reversing the burden of proof and inflating the probative value of neutral evidence; these misdirections likely influenced the jury and caused a substantial miscarriage of justice.
Court Disposition
Conviction and sentence set aside; matter remitted to Court of Appeal to consider retrial.
Orders
- Appellant's conviction and sentence set aside
- Matter remitted to Court of Appeal to consider retrial and make orders for detention or release in accordance with section 21(1) Court of Appeal Act 1964
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment