ACCOR v Digital Assets Inc [2008] DRS 5274 (4 February 2008)
The complainant demonstrated rights in the IBIS mark and the domain name is identical or similar. The respondent registered and used the domain name to take unfair advantage of the complainant's goodwill, earning revenue from sponsored links and directing potential customers to competitors. The respondent's lack of response supports the inference of bad faith. The domain name constitutes an abusive registration.
- Citation
- [2008] DRS 5274
- Parties
- Complainant: ACCOR S. A.; Respondent: Digital Assets Inc
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 04 February 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Domain Name Dispute / Expert Determination
- Outcome
- complaint upheld
- Legal Topics
- Domain Name Disputes, Trade Mark Infringement, Bad Faith Registration
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
ACCOR S. A.
Complainant
Digital Assets Inc
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Domain Name Dispute / Expert Determination
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the complainant has rights in a name or mark identical or similar to the domain name
- 2 Whether the domain name in the hands of the respondent is an abusive registration
Ratio Decidendi
The complainant demonstrated rights in the IBIS mark and the domain name is identical or similar. The respondent registered and used the domain name to take unfair advantage of the complainant's goodwill, earning revenue from sponsored links and directing potential customers to competitors. The respondent's lack of response supports the inference of bad faith. The domain name constitutes an abusive registration.
Court Disposition
complaint upheld
Orders
- Transfer of the domain name ibishotdeals.co.uk to the complainant
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment