JHO Media Ltd v DINODIRECT CHINA LTD (Summary Decision _Transfer) [2015] DRS 15708 (28 April 2015)

JHO Media Ltd v DINODIRECT CHINA LTD (Summary Decision _Transfer) [2015] DRS 15708 (28 April 2015)

The complainant established all three elements required under the Nominet DRS Policy, and the domain name was ordered to be transferred.

Citation
[2015] DRS 15708
Parties
Complainant: JHO Media Ltd; Respondent: DINODIRECT CHINA LTD
Jurisdiction
United Kingdom
Judgment Date
28 April 2015
Procedural Posture
Domain Name Dispute / Summary Decision
Outcome
Transfer ordered
Legal Topics
Domain Name Dispute, Trademark Infringement
Intellectual Property Domain Name Dispute Trademark Infringement

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

JHO Media Ltd

Complainant

DINODIRECT CHINA LTD

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Domain Name Dispute / Summary Decision

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the domain name is identical or similar to a name or mark in which the complainant has rights
  2. 2 Whether the respondent has rights or legitimate interests in respect of the domain name
  3. 3 Whether the domain name was registered or is being used in bad faith

Ratio Decidendi

The complainant established all three elements required under the Nominet DRS Policy, and the domain name was ordered to be transferred.

Court Disposition

Transfer ordered

Orders

  • The domain name is to be transferred to the complainant.