Aer Lingus Ltd -v- Disability UK [2003] DRS 1109 (29 September 2003)

Aer Lingus Ltd -v- Disability UK [2003] DRS 1109 (29 September 2003)

The complainant established rights in the 'Aer Lingus' mark, which is distinctive and well-known. The domain names are identical or similar to the mark. The respondent's explanations for registration and use lack credibility, and there is a strong presumption of initial interest confusion. The use of the domain name to link to a pornographic website further supports abusive registration. The respondent failed to provide evidence of legitimate use or preparations for use. On the balance of probabilities, both domain names are abusive registrations and should be transferred to the complainant.

Citation
[2003] DRS 1109
Parties
Complainant: Aer Lingus Limited; Respondent: Disability UK
Jurisdiction
United Kingdom
Judgment Date
29 September 2003
Procedural Posture
Domain Name Dispute / Decision of Independent Expert
Outcome
Complaint upheld
Legal Topics
Domain Name Disputes, Trade Mark Rights, Abusive Registration, Passing Off
Intellectual Property Internet Law Domain Name Disputes Trade Mark Rights Abusive Registration Passing Off

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Aer Lingus Limited

Complainant

Disability UK

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Domain Name Dispute / Decision of Independent Expert

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the complainant has rights in a name or mark identical or similar to the disputed domain names
  2. 2 Whether the domain names constitute abusive registrations in the hands of the respondent

Ratio Decidendi

The complainant established rights in the 'Aer Lingus' mark, which is distinctive and well-known. The domain names are identical or similar to the mark. The respondent's explanations for registration and use lack credibility, and there is a strong presumption of initial interest confusion. The use of the domain name to link to a pornographic website further supports abusive registration. The respondent failed to provide evidence of legitimate use or preparations for use. On the balance of probabilities, both domain names are abusive registrations and should be transferred to the complainant.

Court Disposition

Complaint upheld

Orders

  • Both domain names <airlingus.co.uk> and <aerlingus.co.uk> to be transferred to the complainant