Balson v Foray Motor Group Ltd (Disability Discrimination: Disability related discrimination) [2017] UKEAT 0288_16_3103 (31 March 2017)
The Tribunal’s reasoning, though linguistically deficient, was adequate and sound; it correctly rejected the asserted causative link between the Claimant’s disability and his redundancy selection. No error of law was disclosed justifying appellate interference.
- Citation
- [2017] UKEAT 0288_16_3103
- Parties
- Appellant Advocate: Adam Ross; Respondent Advocate: Julian Allsop; Respondent Solicitor: Paris Smith LLP
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 31 March 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Appeal / Final Appellate Judgment
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Disability Discrimination, Redundancy, Burden of Proof, Justification Defence
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Adam Ross
Appellant Advocate
Julian Allsop
Respondent Advocate
Paris Smith LLP
Respondent Solicitor
Procedural Posture
Employment Appeal / Final Appellate Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Employment Tribunal failed to consider the impact of the Claimant’s disability on his ability to carry out work, participate in the redundancy process, and on the Respondent’s decision-making under section 15 Equality Act 2010
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal’s reasoning, though linguistically deficient, was adequate and sound; it correctly rejected the asserted causative link between the Claimant’s disability and his redundancy selection. No error of law was disclosed justifying appellate interference.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- appeal dismissed
- no remission to Tribunal
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment