Balson v Foray Motor Group Ltd (Disability Discrimination: Disability related discrimination) [2017] UKEAT 0288_16_3103 (31 March 2017)

Balson v Foray Motor Group Ltd (Disability Discrimination: Disability related discrimination) [2017] UKEAT 0288_16_3103 (31 March 2017)

The Tribunal’s reasoning, though linguistically deficient, was adequate and sound; it correctly rejected the asserted causative link between the Claimant’s disability and his redundancy selection. No error of law was disclosed justifying appellate interference.

Citation
[2017] UKEAT 0288_16_3103
Parties
Appellant Advocate: Adam Ross; Respondent Advocate: Julian Allsop; Respondent Solicitor: Paris Smith LLP
Jurisdiction
United Kingdom
Judgment Date
31 March 2017
Procedural Posture
Employment Appeal / Final Appellate Judgment
Outcome
appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Disability Discrimination, Redundancy, Burden of Proof, Justification Defence

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 5
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Adam Ross

Appellant Advocate

Julian Allsop

Respondent Advocate

Paris Smith LLP

Respondent Solicitor

Procedural Posture

Employment Appeal / Final Appellate Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the Employment Tribunal failed to consider the impact of the Claimant’s disability on his ability to carry out work, participate in the redundancy process, and on the Respondent’s decision-making under section 15 Equality Act 2010

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal’s reasoning, though linguistically deficient, was adequate and sound; it correctly rejected the asserted causative link between the Claimant’s disability and his redundancy selection. No error of law was disclosed justifying appellate interference.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed

Orders

  • appeal dismissed
  • no remission to Tribunal