Divinus Support Ltd & Anor v Care Quality Commission [2024] UKFTT 0263 (HESC) (28 March 2024)

The tribunal found that the Care Quality Commission acted within its statutory powers in cancelling the registration, and the applicants failed to demonstrate grounds for overturning the decision.

Source-derived case information.

Citation: [2024] UKFTT 0263 (HESC)
Parties: Applicant: Divinus Support Ltd; Applicant: Angela Burke; Respondent: Care Quality Commission
Jurisdiction: United Kingdom
Judgment Date: 28 March 2024
Procedural Posture: First Tier Tribunal (health Education and Social Care Chamber) / Judgment
Outcome: application dismissed
Legal Topics: Cancellation of Registration, Care Quality Commission, Establishments and Agencies

Health Law Administrative Law Cancellation of Registration Care Quality Commission Establishments and Agencies

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2

Parties

Divinus Support Ltd

Applicant

Angela Burke

Applicant

Care Quality Commission

Respondent

Procedural Posture

First Tier Tribunal (health Education and Social Care Chamber) / Judgment

Legal Issues

1 Whether the cancellation of registration by the Care Quality Commission was lawful and justified

Ratio Decidendi

The tribunal found that the Care Quality Commission acted within its statutory powers in cancelling the registration, and the applicants failed to demonstrate grounds for overturning the decision.

Court Disposition

application dismissed

Orders

The cancellation of registration stands.

About this LexChat collection

Publisher and coverage

LexChat is published by Esheria. Coverage reflects the case law currently mapped from identified source collections; it may be incomplete, delayed, or later corrected. The official source controls where it differs from this research page.

AI and research method

Source-derived facts are shown separately from AI-generated material. If an AI summary is available, it is explicitly labelled and remains a non-authoritative research aid.

Corrections and reporting

Report a source mismatch, factual issue, personal-data concern, or licensing question to support@esheria.co.ke. Include this page's URL and the supporting official source so the record can be reviewed, corrected, restricted, or withdrawn.

Legal-information disclaimer

LexChat provides legal information and research tools, not legal advice. Verify currency, status, citations, and jurisdiction with authoritative sources and a qualified professional where appropriate.