Mr R D Wilson v DL Insurance Services Ltd: (England and Wales : Breach of Contract : Disability Discrimination : Public Interest Disclosure : Unfair Dismissal) [2017] UKET 2401437/2016 (10 May 2017)

Mr R D Wilson v DL Insurance Services Ltd: (England and Wales : Breach of Contract : Disability Discrimination : Public Interest Disclosure : Unfair Dismissal) [2017] UKET 2401437/2016 (10 May 2017)

The tribunal found that the claimant was unfairly dismissed and subjected to disability discrimination and detriment for making a protected disclosure. The respondent failed to follow fair procedures and did not provide adequate justification for the dismissal or the treatment of the claimant.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2017] UKET 2401437/2016
Parties
Claimant: Mr R D Wilson; Respondent: DL Insurance Services Ltd
Jurisdiction
United Kingdom
Judgment Date
10 May 2017
Procedural Posture
Employment Tribunal / Judgment
Outcome
Claim upheld in part
Legal Topics
Breach of Contract, Disability Discrimination, Public Interest Disclosure, Unfair Dismissal
Employment Law Breach of Contract Disability Discrimination Public Interest Disclosure Unfair Dismissal

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Mr R D Wilson

Claimant

DL Insurance Services Ltd

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Tribunal / Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the claimant was unfairly dismissed
  2. 2 Whether the claimant was discriminated against on the grounds of disability
  3. 3 Whether there was a breach of contract

Ratio Decidendi

The tribunal found that the claimant was unfairly dismissed and subjected to disability discrimination and detriment for making a protected disclosure. The respondent failed to follow fair procedures and did not provide adequate justification for the dismissal or the treatment of the claimant.

Court Disposition

Claim upheld in part

Orders

  • The respondent is ordered to pay compensation to the claimant for unfair dismissal, disability discrimination, and detriment for protected disclosure.