Edible Blooms v DLA Piper Edible Arrangements Edible Arrangements International (Full Decision _Transfer) [2016] DRS 17374 (21 September 2016)
The Panel found that the domain name is confusingly similar to the complainant's trade mark, that the respondent had no rights or legitimate interests in the domain name, and that the domain name was registered and is being used in bad faith.
- Citation
- [2016] DRS 17374
- Parties
- Complainant: Edible Blooms; Respondent: DLA Piper; Respondent: Edible Arrangements; Respondent: Edible Arrangements International
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 21 September 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Domain Name Dispute / Final Decision
- Outcome
- Transfer of domain name ordered
- Legal Topics
- Domain Name Dispute, Trade Mark Infringement
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Edible Blooms
Complainant
DLA Piper
Respondent
Edible Arrangements
Respondent
Edible Arrangements International
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Domain Name Dispute / Final Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the domain name is identical or similar to a name or mark in which the complainant has rights
- 2 Whether the respondent has rights or legitimate interests in respect of the domain name
- 3 Whether the domain name was registered or is being used in bad faith
Ratio Decidendi
The Panel found that the domain name is confusingly similar to the complainant's trade mark, that the respondent had no rights or legitimate interests in the domain name, and that the domain name was registered and is being used in bad faith.
Court Disposition
Transfer of domain name ordered
Orders
- The domain name is to be transferred to the complainant.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment