Jupiter Investment Management Group Ltd v Domain Administration Ltd [2008] DRS 05264 (22 January 2008)

Jupiter Investment Management Group Ltd v Domain Administration Ltd [2008] DRS 05264 (22 January 2008)

The Complainant has established rights in JUPITER and JUPITERONLINE, both similar to the Domain Name. The Respondent's registration and use of the Domain Name constitutes Abusive Registration, evidenced by a pattern of similar conduct and failure to rebut the presumption under the Policy.

Citation
[2008] DRS 05264
Parties
Complainant: Jupiter Investment Management Group Ltd; Respondent: Domain Administration Limited
Jurisdiction
United Kingdom
Judgment Date
22 January 2008
Procedural Posture
Domain Name Dispute / Expert Decision
Outcome
Domain Name Transfer Ordered
Legal Topics
Domain Name Dispute, Trademark Infringement, Typosquatting, Abusive Registration
Intellectual Property Internet Law Domain Name Dispute Trademark Infringement Typosquatting Abusive Registration

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 23 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Jupiter Investment Management Group Ltd

Complainant

Domain Administration Limited

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Domain Name Dispute / Expert Decision

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the Complainant has rights in a name or mark similar to the Domain Name
  2. 2 Whether the Domain Name is an Abusive Registration

Ratio Decidendi

The Complainant has established rights in JUPITER and JUPITERONLINE, both similar to the Domain Name. The Respondent's registration and use of the Domain Name constitutes Abusive Registration, evidenced by a pattern of similar conduct and failure to rebut the presumption under the Policy.

Court Disposition

Domain Name Transfer Ordered

Orders

  • The Domain Name jupitoronline.co.uk shall be transferred to the Complainant.