ICC INTERCERTUS CAPITAL LTD v DomainWebber (Summary Decision _Transfer) [2020] DRS 22624 (04 June 2020)

ICC INTERCERTUS CAPITAL LTD v DomainWebber (Summary Decision _Transfer) [2020] DRS 22624 (04 June 2020)

The Panel found that the Complainant had rights in the mark and that the domain name was identical or similar, and that the registration was abusive. Transfer of the domain name was ordered.

Citation
[2020] DRS 22624
Parties
Complainant: ICC Intercertus Capital Ltd; Respondent: DomainWebber
Jurisdiction
United Kingdom
Judgment Date
04 June 2020
Procedural Posture
Domain Name Dispute / Summary Decision
Outcome
Transfer ordered
Legal Topics
Domain Name Dispute, Trade Mark Infringement
Intellectual Property Domain Name Dispute Trade Mark Infringement

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

ICC Intercertus Capital Ltd

Complainant

DomainWebber

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Domain Name Dispute / Summary Decision

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the domain name registered by the Respondent is identical or similar to a name or mark in which the Complainant has rights
  2. 2 Whether the registration is abusive

Ratio Decidendi

The Panel found that the Complainant had rights in the mark and that the domain name was identical or similar, and that the registration was abusive. Transfer of the domain name was ordered.

Court Disposition

Transfer ordered

Orders

  • The domain name is to be transferred to the Complainant.