Porter v Revenue & Customs [2012] UKFTT 87 (TC) (26 January 2012)
There was no good explanation for the long delay in making the application; primary responsibility for the delay rests with Mr Porter. He had ample opportunity to provide evidence and failed to do so. The prejudice to HMRC and public interest in finality outweigh any arguments for reopening the appeal. The balance overwhelmingly favours HMRC; permission for late appeal is refused.
- Citation
- [2012] UKFTT 87 (TC)
- Parties
- Appellant: Donald Porter; Respondents: The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 26 January 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Application for Permission to Appeal Out of Time
- Outcome
- Application for permission to appeal out of time dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- Income Tax, Corporation Tax, Self Assessment, Closure Notices, Late Appeal, HMRC Review Procedures
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Donald Porter
Appellant
The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Application for Permission to Appeal Out of Time
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether permission should be granted for a late appeal against HMRC's closure notices amending tax liability for 2000-01, 2001-02, and 2002-03
Ratio Decidendi
There was no good explanation for the long delay in making the application; primary responsibility for the delay rests with Mr Porter. He had ample opportunity to provide evidence and failed to do so. The prejudice to HMRC and public interest in finality outweigh any arguments for reopening the appeal. The balance overwhelmingly favours HMRC; permission for late appeal is refused.
Court Disposition
Application for permission to appeal out of time dismissed.
Orders
- Permission to make a late appeal is refused.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment