Vinter v V D Bateman Ltd [1996] UKEAT 1330_95_3004 (30 April 1996)

Vinter v V D Bateman Ltd [1996] UKEAT 1330_95_3004 (30 April 1996)

The appeal is dismissed because it has already been decided and dismissed, is many months out of time with no good excuse, and the appellant failed to obtain extended reasons within the required timeframe.

Citation
[1996] UKEAT 1330_95_3004
Parties
Appellant: Donald Vinter; Respondent: D Bateman Ltd
Jurisdiction
United Kingdom
Judgment Date
30 April 1996
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Preliminary Hearing
Outcome
appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Redundancy Pay, Jurisdiction, Extension of Time, Appeal Procedure
Employment Law Redundancy Pay Jurisdiction Extension of Time Appeal Procedure

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Donald Vinter

Appellant

D Bateman Ltd

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Preliminary Hearing

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether leave should be granted to enter a notice of appeal out of time
  2. 2 Whether the Tribunal erred in refusing extended reasons
  3. 3 Whether the appellant can appeal twice in the same case

Ratio Decidendi

The appeal is dismissed because it has already been decided and dismissed, is many months out of time with no good excuse, and the appellant failed to obtain extended reasons within the required timeframe.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Appeal against Registrar's order dismissed