Jaguar Land Rover Limited v Dorlin Transport Services Ltd (Full Decision _Transfer) [2017] DRS 17594 (13 February 2017)

Jaguar Land Rover Limited v Dorlin Transport Services Ltd (Full Decision _Transfer) [2017] DRS 17594 (13 February 2017)

The Panel found that the complainant had established rights in the trademark, that the domain name was identical or similar, that the respondent had no rights or legitimate interests, and that the domain name was registered and used in bad faith.

Citation
[2017] DRS 17594
Parties
Complainant: Jaguar Land Rover Limited; Respondent: Dorlin Transport Services Ltd
Jurisdiction
United Kingdom
Judgment Date
13 February 2017
Procedural Posture
Domain Name Dispute / Full Decision
Outcome
Complaint upheld
Legal Topics
Domain Name Dispute, Trademark Infringement
Intellectual Property Domain Name Dispute Trademark Infringement

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Jaguar Land Rover Limited

Complainant

Dorlin Transport Services Ltd

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Domain Name Dispute / Full Decision

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the domain name registered by the respondent is identical or similar to a trademark in which the complainant has rights
  2. 2 Whether the respondent has rights or legitimate interests in respect of the domain name
  3. 3 Whether the domain name was registered or is being used in bad faith

Ratio Decidendi

The Panel found that the complainant had established rights in the trademark, that the domain name was identical or similar, that the respondent had no rights or legitimate interests, and that the domain name was registered and used in bad faith.

Court Disposition

Complaint upheld

Orders

  • The domain name is to be transferred to the complainant