DP Langan Ltd v Revenue and Customs (INCOME TAX - Coronavirus job retention scheme) [2025] UKFTT 958 (TC) (07 August 2025)
The CJRS Direction requires reference salary for fixed rate employees to be determined by the amount paid in the last salary period before 19 March 2020. Paragraph 7.12 does not permit increasing the reference salary by post-19 March pay rises; it only allows correction of underpayments to meet the 80% threshold. The appellant's claims based on increased salaries were excessive and not permitted under the scheme. HMRC's assessments, as amended, were valid.
- Citation
- [2025] UKFTT 958 (TC)
- Parties
- Appellant: DP Langan Limited; Respondents: The Commissioners for His Majesty's Revenue and Customs
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 07 August 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Income Tax Appeal (first Tier Tribunal, Tax Chamber) / Final Judgment After Remote Video Hearing
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme (cjrs), Income Tax Assessments, Statutory Interpretation, Reference Salary, Furlough Scheme, PAYE, HMRC Compliance
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
DP Langan Limited
Appellant
The Commissioners for His Majesty's Revenue and Customs
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Income Tax Appeal (first Tier Tribunal, Tax Chamber) / Final Judgment After Remote Video Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether DP Langan Limited was entitled to claim CJRS grants based on increased salaries after 19 March 2020
- 2 Whether paragraph 7.12 of the CJRS Direction allows for 'topping up' reference salary for CJRS claims
- 3 Whether HMRC's income tax assessments for overclaimed CJRS amounts were valid
Ratio Decidendi
The CJRS Direction requires reference salary for fixed rate employees to be determined by the amount paid in the last salary period before 19 March 2020. Paragraph 7.12 does not permit increasing the reference salary by post-19 March pay rises; it only allows correction of underpayments to meet the 80% threshold. The appellant's claims based on increased salaries were excessive and not permitted under the scheme. HMRC's assessments, as amended, were valid.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Taxpayer's appeal against the assessments, as amended on review, is dismissed.
- Assessments increased in accordance with HMRC's review conclusion letter.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment