Mr Golding v DPD Group Ltd (England and Wales : Public Interest Disclosure) [2025] UKET 2302793/2022 (30 April 2025)

The Tribunal found that Mr Golding made protected disclosures and was subjected to detriment by DPD Group Ltd, contrary to section 47B of the Employment Rights Act 1996.

Citation: [2025] UKET 2302793/2022
Parties: Claimant: Mr Golding; Respondent: DPD Group Ltd
Jurisdiction: United Kingdom
Judgment Date: 30 April 2025
Procedural Posture: Employment Tribunal / Final Judgment
Outcome: Claim upheld
Legal Topics: Public Interest Disclosure, Whistleblowing

Employment Law Public Interest Disclosure Whistleblowing

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1

Parties

Mr Golding

Claimant

DPD Group Ltd

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Tribunal / Final Judgment

Legal Issues

1 Whether Mr Golding was subjected to detriment for making a protected disclosure under the Employment Rights Act 1996

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal found that Mr Golding made protected disclosures and was subjected to detriment by DPD Group Ltd, contrary to section 47B of the Employment Rights Act 1996.

Court Disposition

Claim upheld

Orders

DPD Group Ltd to pay compensation to Mr Golding for detriment suffered