Arhin v Enfield Primary Care Trust [2010] UKEAT 0296_09_2601 (26 January 2010)

Arhin v Enfield Primary Care Trust [2010] UKEAT 0296_09_2601 (26 January 2010)

The Tribunal's decision was inadequate and inconsistent, failing to address central issues and provide sufficient reasoning; therefore, the appeal is allowed and the matter remitted to a fresh Tribunal for reconsideration of the race discrimination claim.

Citation
[2010] UKEAT 0296_09_2601
Parties
Appellant: Dr D C Arhin; Respondent: Ms M Murphy
Jurisdiction
United Kingdom
Judgment Date
26 January 2010
Procedural Posture
Employment Appeal / Appeal Against Employment Tribunal Decision
Outcome
Appeal allowed; case remitted to a fresh Tribunal for reconsideration of race discrimination claim.
Legal Topics
Redundancy, Unfair Dismissal, Race Discrimination, Appellate Procedure

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Dr D C Arhin

Appellant

Ms M Murphy

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Appeal / Appeal Against Employment Tribunal Decision

  1. 1 Whether the employer discriminated against the claimant on grounds of race in selection for redundancy
  2. 2 Whether the Tribunal's reasoning was adequate and consistent

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal's decision was inadequate and inconsistent, failing to address central issues and provide sufficient reasoning; therefore, the appeal is allowed and the matter remitted to a fresh Tribunal for reconsideration of the race discrimination claim.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed; case remitted to a fresh Tribunal for reconsideration of race discrimination claim.

Orders

  • Remission to a fresh Tribunal for determination of race discrimination claim.
  • Unfair dismissal finding stands; no remission on that issue.