Arhin v Enfield Primary Care Trust [2010] UKEAT 0296_09_2601 (26 January 2010)
The Tribunal's decision was inadequate and inconsistent, failing to address central issues and provide sufficient reasoning; therefore, the appeal is allowed and the matter remitted to a fresh Tribunal for reconsideration of the race discrimination claim.
- Citation
- [2010] UKEAT 0296_09_2601
- Parties
- Appellant: Dr D C Arhin; Respondent: Ms M Murphy
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 26 January 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Appeal / Appeal Against Employment Tribunal Decision
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; case remitted to a fresh Tribunal for reconsideration of race discrimination claim.
- Legal Topics
- Redundancy, Unfair Dismissal, Race Discrimination, Appellate Procedure
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Dr D C Arhin
Appellant
Ms M Murphy
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Appeal / Appeal Against Employment Tribunal Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the employer discriminated against the claimant on grounds of race in selection for redundancy
- 2 Whether the Tribunal's reasoning was adequate and consistent
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal's decision was inadequate and inconsistent, failing to address central issues and provide sufficient reasoning; therefore, the appeal is allowed and the matter remitted to a fresh Tribunal for reconsideration of the race discrimination claim.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; case remitted to a fresh Tribunal for reconsideration of race discrimination claim.
Orders
- Remission to a fresh Tribunal for determination of race discrimination claim.
- Unfair dismissal finding stands; no remission on that issue.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment