Dalgarno v United Kingdom Atomic Energy Authority [1995] UKEAT 277_94_1110 (11 October 1995)

The Tribunal found no legal error or arguable point of law in the original decision on contributory fault and held that the interests of justice did not require a review.

Citation: [1995] UKEAT 277_94_1110
Parties: Appellant: Dr Dalgarno
Jurisdiction: United Kingdom
Judgment Date: 11 October 1995
Procedural Posture: Employment Appeal / Preliminary Hearing Application for Review
Outcome: application for review refused
Legal Topics: Unfair Dismissal, Contributory Fault, Review Procedure, Perversity

Employment Law Unfair Dismissal Contributory Fault Review Procedure Perversity

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1

Parties

Dr Dalgarno

Appellant

Procedural Posture

Employment Appeal / Preliminary Hearing Application for Review

Legal Issues

1 Whether the finding of 80% contributory fault was perverse and unsupported by evidence
2 Whether the interests of justice required a review of the dismissal of the appeal

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal found no legal error or arguable point of law in the original decision on contributory fault and held that the interests of justice did not require a review.

Court Disposition

application for review refused

Orders

application for review is dismissed