Singh v Glasgow University & Anor (Race Discrimination) [2012] UKEAT 0006_11_1007 (10 July 2012).

No fair-minded and informed observer would conclude the Employment Judge was biased or acted in his own cause. The Employment Tribunal was entitled to find the document was not a forgery or intended to deceive. The findings were not perverse and the claimant's arguments amounted to re-arguing facts, which is not permitted on appeal.

Citation: [2012] UKEAT 0006_11_1007
Parties: Appellant: Dr Prim Singh; Respondent's Solicitor: Mrs M Sangster
Jurisdiction: United Kingdom
Judgment Date: 10 July 2012
Procedural Posture: Employment Appeal / Appeal Judgment
Outcome: Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics: Race Discrimination, Bias, Forgery, Deceit, Fair Hearing

Employment Law Discrimination Law Race Discrimination Bias Forgery Deceit Fair Hearing

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 12 Party arguments 2

Parties

Dr Prim Singh

Appellant

Mrs M Sangster

Respondent's Solicitor

Procedural Posture

Employment Appeal / Appeal Judgment

Legal Issues

1 Whether the Employment Judge was biased or acted in his own cause
2 Whether the document dated 3 August 2005 was a forgery or intended to deceive
3 Whether the Employment Judge's findings were perverse

Ratio Decidendi

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

Both parties may submit written submissions on expenses within 21 days.
Decision on expenses will be made based on written submissions without oral hearing.