Qing-Ping Ma v. Merck Sharp & Dohme Ltd [2007] UKEAT 0448_06_0602 (6 February 2007)
The Tribunal Chairman failed to properly consider whether the alleged acts were part of a continuing discriminatory state of affairs linked by Dr Ma's ethnicity, and erred by focusing on technical pleading requirements and isolated acts without considering the overall pattern.
- Citation
- [2007] UKEAT 0448_06_0602
- Parties
- Appellant: Dr Qing-Ping Ma; Respondent: Merck Sharp & Dohme Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 06 February 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Tribunal Appeal / Appeal Against Preliminary Ruling on Time Limits
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; preliminary ruling set aside; case remitted for reconsideration.
- Legal Topics
- Race Discrimination, Continuing Act, Time Limits, Race Relations Act 1976
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Dr Qing-Ping Ma
Appellant
Merck Sharp & Dohme Ltd
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Tribunal Appeal / Appeal Against Preliminary Ruling on Time Limits
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Tribunal applied the correct test for continuing acts under the Race Relations Act 1976
- 2 Whether complaints relating to acts before 22 May 2005 were out of time
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal Chairman failed to properly consider whether the alleged acts were part of a continuing discriminatory state of affairs linked by Dr Ma's ethnicity, and erred by focusing on technical pleading requirements and isolated acts without considering the overall pattern.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; preliminary ruling set aside; case remitted for reconsideration.
Orders
- Chairman's ruling that complaints relating to acts before 22 May 2005 were out of time is set aside.
- Case remitted to another Chairman to determine the preliminary issue in light of this judgment.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment