General Optical Council v Dr Sydney Bush (Full Decision _Transfer) [2011] DRS 10135 (12 September 2011)
The Panel found that the complainant had rights in the name and that the respondent's registration was abusive, warranting a transfer of the domain name.
- Citation
- [2011] DRS 10135
- Parties
- Complainant: General Optical Council; Respondent: Dr Sydney Bush
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 12 September 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Domain Name Dispute / Full Decision
- Outcome
- Domain name transferred to complainant
- Legal Topics
- Domain Name Transfer, Trade Mark Infringement
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2
Parties
General Optical Council
Complainant
Dr Sydney Bush
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Domain Name Dispute / Full Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the domain name registration is abusive
- 2 Whether the complainant has rights in a name or mark identical or similar to the domain name
Ratio Decidendi
The Panel found that the complainant had rights in the name and that the respondent's registration was abusive, warranting a transfer of the domain name.
Court Disposition
Domain name transferred to complainant
Orders
- Transfer of the domain name to the General Optical Council
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment