Valkova v. Benefit Agency Medical Services [2001] UKEAT 563_99_2401 (24 January 2001)
The appeal is arguable because the Tribunal may have used the wrong power, reached an unjustified conclusion about the Appellant's intent, and followed an unjust procedure.
- Citation
- [2001] UKEAT 563_99_2401
- Parties
- Appellant: Dr Valkova; Respondent: Unknown
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 24 January 2001
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Appeal / Preliminary Hearing
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed to proceed to full hearing
- Legal Topics
- Tribunal Procedure, Adjournment Requests, Show Cause Orders, Strike Out of Claims
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Parties
Dr Valkova
Appellant
Unknown
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Appeal / Preliminary Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Tribunal used the correct power to proceed
- 2 Whether the Tribunal was entitled to conclude the Appellant had no serious intention to pursue her claim
- 3 Whether the procedure followed was unjust due to insufficient opportunity to respond to the show-cause Order
Ratio Decidendi
The appeal is arguable because the Tribunal may have used the wrong power, reached an unjustified conclusion about the Appellant's intent, and followed an unjust procedure.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed to proceed to full hearing
Orders
- Appeal expedited
- Chairman's Notes to be made available regarding adjournment request and show-cause Order
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment