Mr R Kinsman (Junior) v Drumconner Ltd and 2 others (England and Wales : Age Discrimination : Disability Discrimination : Race Discrimination : Sexual Orientation Discrimination/Transexualism) [2017] UKET 1401769/2016 (27 March 2017)
The tribunal determined whether the claimant had established facts from which it could conclude that discrimination had occurred, and whether the respondents could provide a non-discriminatory explanation for their actions.
- Citation
- [2017] UKET 1401769/2016
- Parties
- Claimant: Mr R Kinsman (Junior); Respondent: Drumconner Ltd; Respondent: Unnamed Respondent 2; Respondent: Unnamed Respondent 3
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 27 March 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Tribunal / Judgment
- Outcome
- Judgment delivered; outcome not specified in the provided text.
- Legal Topics
- Age Discrimination, Disability Discrimination, Race Discrimination, Sexual Orientation Discrimination, Transexualism
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mr R Kinsman (Junior)
Claimant
Drumconner Ltd
Respondent
Unnamed Respondent 2
Respondent
Unnamed Respondent 3
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Tribunal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the claimant was subjected to unlawful discrimination on grounds of age, disability, race, or sexual orientation/transexualism
Ratio Decidendi
The tribunal determined whether the claimant had established facts from which it could conclude that discrimination had occurred, and whether the respondents could provide a non-discriminatory explanation for their actions.
Court Disposition
Judgment delivered; outcome not specified in the provided text.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment