Fit Foods Limited v Dynamita S.A.S. (Summary Decision _Transfer) [2019] DRS 21704 (17 October 2019)

Fit Foods Limited v Dynamita S.A.S. (Summary Decision _Transfer) [2019] DRS 21704 (17 October 2019)

The complainant established rights in the name and the respondent's lack of response and circumstances indicated bad faith registration, warranting transfer.

Citation
[2019] DRS 21704
Parties
Complainant: Fit Foods Limited; Respondent: Dynamita S. A. S.
Jurisdiction
United Kingdom
Judgment Date
17 October 2019
Procedural Posture
Domain Name Dispute / Summary Decision
Outcome
Transfer ordered
Legal Topics
Domain Name Transfer, Bad Faith Registration

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Fit Foods Limited

Complainant

Dynamita S. A. S.

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Domain Name Dispute / Summary Decision

  1. 1 Whether the domain name was registered in bad faith
  2. 2 Whether the complainant has rights in the name

Ratio Decidendi

The complainant established rights in the name and the respondent's lack of response and circumstances indicated bad faith registration, warranting transfer.

Court Disposition

Transfer ordered

Orders

  • The domain name is to be transferred to the complainant.