Earthshine Ltd v Revenue & Customs [2011] UKFTT 667 (TC) (20 October 2011)
Earthshine's transactions were connected to fraudulent tax loss and Earthshine knew or ought to have known of this connection; input tax recovery is denied under the Kittel principle as adopted in English law.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2011] UKFTT 667
- Parties
- Appellant: Earthshine Ltd (In Liquidation); Respondents: The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 20 October 2011
- Procedural Posture
- VAT Appeal / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- VAT Fraud, MTIC Fraud, Input Tax Recovery, Burden of Proof, Standard of Proof, Pleading Requirements, Admissibility of Evidence
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Earthshine Ltd (In Liquidation)
Appellant
The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs
Respondents
Procedural Posture
VAT Appeal / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Earthshine's transactions were connected to fraudulent tax loss
- 2 Whether Earthshine knew or ought to have known of the connection to fraud
- 3 Whether HMRC pleaded knowledge with sufficient particularity
Ratio Decidendi
Earthshine's transactions were connected to fraudulent tax loss and Earthshine knew or ought to have known of this connection; input tax recovery is denied under the Kittel principle as adopted in English law.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Earthshine Ltd is denied recovery of input tax totalling £303,646.35 for the transactions at issue.
- No further relief granted to the Appellant.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment