Neil Channing v Easyodds . Com Limited (Summary Decision _Transfer) [2011] DRS 9617 (25 May 2011)

Neil Channing v Easyodds . Com Limited (Summary Decision _Transfer) [2011] DRS 9617 (25 May 2011)

The panel found that the complainant satisfied all three elements required under the Policy and ordered the transfer of the domain name to the complainant.

Citation
[2011] DRS 9617
Parties
Complainant: Neil Channing; Respondent: Easyodds . Com Limited
Jurisdiction
United Kingdom
Judgment Date
25 May 2011
Procedural Posture
Domain Name Dispute / Summary Decision
Outcome
Transfer of domain name ordered
Legal Topics
Domain Name Dispute, Trademark Infringement
Intellectual Property Domain Name Dispute Trademark Infringement

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Neil Channing

Complainant

Easyodds . Com Limited

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Domain Name Dispute / Summary Decision

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the domain name is identical or similar to a name or mark in which the complainant has rights
  2. 2 Whether the respondent has rights or legitimate interests in respect of the domain name
  3. 3 Whether the domain name was registered or is being used in bad faith

Ratio Decidendi

The panel found that the complainant satisfied all three elements required under the Policy and ordered the transfer of the domain name to the complainant.

Court Disposition

Transfer of domain name ordered

Orders

  • The domain name is to be transferred to the complainant.