Holt v EB Security Ltd (Jurisdictional Points : Continuity of employment) [2012] UKEAT 0558_11_1307 (13 July 2012)
The gap in employment between the claimant's contracts with associated employers was a temporary cessation of work under section 212(3)(b) ERA, preserving continuity of employment and enabling the claimant to bring a claim for unfair dismissal.
- Citation
- [2012] UKEAT 0558_11_1307
- Parties
- Claimant/appellant: Mr Gary Holt; Respondent: EB Security Ltd (in liquidation)
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 13 July 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Appeal / Appeal Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Continuity of Employment, Unfair Dismissal, Temporary Cessation of Work
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mr Gary Holt
Claimant/appellant
EB Security Ltd (in liquidation)
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Appeal / Appeal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the claimant had sufficient continuous service to bring a claim for unfair dismissal
- 2 Whether the gap in employment constituted a temporary cessation of work under section 212(3)(b) ERA
Ratio Decidendi
The gap in employment between the claimant's contracts with associated employers was a temporary cessation of work under section 212(3)(b) ERA, preserving continuity of employment and enabling the claimant to bring a claim for unfair dismissal.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- Continuity of employment from July 2007 to January 2010 declared.
- Tribunal has jurisdiction to entertain the complaint of unfair dismissal.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment