Chandan Limited (trading as Mela Restaurant) v EDOCO LTD (Summary Decision _Transfer) [2010] DRS 9231 (01 December 2010)
The Panel found that the Complainant had rights in the name and that the Respondent's registration was abusive, justifying transfer of the domain name.
- Citation
- [2010] DRS 9231
- Parties
- Complainant: Chandan Limited (trading as Mela Restaurant); Respondent: EDOCO LTD
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 01 December 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Domain Name Dispute / Summary Decision
- Outcome
- Domain name transferred to Complainant
- Legal Topics
- Domain Name Dispute, Passing Off, Trademark Infringement
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2
Parties
Chandan Limited (trading as Mela Restaurant)
Complainant
EDOCO LTD
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Domain Name Dispute / Summary Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the domain name registration by the Respondent is abusive
- 2 Whether the Complainant has rights in a name or mark identical or similar to the domain name
Ratio Decidendi
The Panel found that the Complainant had rights in the name and that the Respondent's registration was abusive, justifying transfer of the domain name.
Court Disposition
Domain name transferred to Complainant
Orders
- Transfer of the disputed domain name to the Complainant
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment