Hays Plc v EDOCO LTD. (Summary Decision _Transfer) [2012] DRS 11086 (25 April 2012)
The Panel found that the Complainant had rights in the name and mark, and that the Respondent's registration was abusive, justifying transfer of the domain name.
- Citation
- [2012] DRS 11086
- Parties
- Complainant: Hays Plc; Respondent: EDOCO LTD.
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 25 April 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Domain Name Dispute / Summary Decision
- Outcome
- Transfer ordered
- Legal Topics
- Domain Name Dispute, Passing Off, Trademark Infringement
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Parties
Hays Plc
Complainant
EDOCO LTD.
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Domain Name Dispute / Summary Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the domain name registered by the Respondent is identical or similar to a name or mark in which the Complainant has rights
- 2 Whether the Respondent's registration is abusive
Ratio Decidendi
The Panel found that the Complainant had rights in the name and mark, and that the Respondent's registration was abusive, justifying transfer of the domain name.
Court Disposition
Transfer ordered
Orders
- The domain name is to be transferred to the Complainant.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment