Cortes v The Information Commissioner [2023] UKFTT 615 (GRC) (10 July 2023)
The Tribunal has no jurisdiction to consider the substantive merits of the Information Commissioner's decision or to grant the remedies sought by the applicant. The application has no reasonable prospect of success and must be struck out under rule 8(3)(c) of the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (General Regulatory Chamber) Rules 2009.
- Citation
- [2023] UKFTT 615 (GRC)
- Parties
- Applicant: Eduardo Cortes; Respondent: The Information Commissioner
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 10 July 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Application Under Section 166 of the Data Protection Act 2018 / Strike Out Application Determined on the Papers
- Outcome
- Application struck out
- Legal Topics
- Section 166 Data Protection Act 2018, Jurisdiction of Tribunal, Appropriate Steps by Information Commissioner, Right to Complain Under GDPR
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Eduardo Cortes
Applicant
The Information Commissioner
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Application Under Section 166 of the Data Protection Act 2018 / Strike Out Application Determined on the Papers
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Tribunal has jurisdiction to consider the merits of the Information Commissioner's substantive decision
- 2 Whether the Information Commissioner took appropriate steps under section 165 and 166 DPA 2018
- 3 Whether the applicant is entitled to costs
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal has no jurisdiction to consider the substantive merits of the Information Commissioner's decision or to grant the remedies sought by the applicant. The application has no reasonable prospect of success and must be struck out under rule 8(3)(c) of the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (General Regulatory Chamber) Rules 2009.
Court Disposition
Application struck out
Orders
- Proceedings struck out pursuant to rule 8(3)(c) of the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (General Regulatory Chamber) Rules 2009 on the grounds that there is no reasonable prospect of it succeeding.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment