Williams v The Information Commissioner & Anor [2023] UKFTT 1003 (GRC) (29 November 2023)

Williams v The Information Commissioner & Anor [2023] UKFTT 1003 (GRC) (29 November 2023)

The requested invoice details are exempt under section 43(2) FOIA as their disclosure would prejudice the commercial interests of the Home Office and its suppliers. The public interest in maintaining the exemption outweighs the public interest in disclosure, given the risk to procurement integrity, future competition, and value for money.

Citation
[2023] UKFTT 1003 (GRC)
Parties
Appellant: Edward Williams; First Respondent: Information Commissioner; Second Respondent: Home Office
Jurisdiction
United Kingdom
Judgment Date
29 November 2023
Procedural Posture
Freedom of Information Act 2000 Appeal / First Tier Tribunal (general Regulatory Chamber) Determination on the Papers
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Freedom of Information, Commercial Interests Exemption, Public Interest Test, Procurement Confidentiality

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 7 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Edward Williams

Appellant

Information Commissioner

First Respondent

Home Office

Second Respondent

Procedural Posture

Freedom of Information Act 2000 Appeal / First Tier Tribunal (general Regulatory Chamber) Determination on the Papers

  1. 1 Whether disclosure of the requested invoice details is exempt under section 43(2) FOIA due to prejudice to commercial interests
  2. 2 Whether the public interest in disclosure outweighs the exemption

Ratio Decidendi

The requested invoice details are exempt under section 43(2) FOIA as their disclosure would prejudice the commercial interests of the Home Office and its suppliers. The public interest in maintaining the exemption outweighs the public interest in disclosure, given the risk to procurement integrity, future competition, and value for money.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed