Mr G Pokrop v Elite Joinery Manufacturing Ltd and Others (Scotland : Breach of Contract : Protective Award : Race Discrimination : Redundancy : Unfair Dismissal : Unlawful Deduction from Wages : Working Time Regulations) [2017] UKET 4118882/2014 (24 March 2017)

The tribunal found that the claimant was unfairly dismissed and suffered unlawful deductions from wages, with insufficient evidence to support race discrimination.

Source-derived case information.

Citation: [2017] UKET 4118882/2014
Parties: Claimant: Mr G Pokrop; Respondent: Elite Joinery Manufacturing Ltd; Respondent: Others
Jurisdiction: United Kingdom
Judgment Date: 24 March 2017
Procedural Posture: Employment Tribunal / Final Judgment
Outcome: Claim partly upheld
Legal Topics: Breach of Contract, Protective Award, Race Discrimination, Redundancy, Unfair Dismissal, Unlawful Deduction From Wages, Working Time Regulations

Employment Law Breach of Contract Protective Award Race Discrimination Redundancy Unfair Dismissal Unlawful Deduction From Wages Working Time Regulations

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2

Parties

Mr G Pokrop

Claimant

Elite Joinery Manufacturing Ltd

Respondent

Others

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Tribunal / Final Judgment

Legal Issues

1 Whether the claimant was unfairly dismissed
2 Whether there was a breach of contract
3 Whether there was race discrimination

Ratio Decidendi

The tribunal found that the claimant was unfairly dismissed and suffered unlawful deductions from wages, with insufficient evidence to support race discrimination.

Court Disposition

Claim partly upheld

Orders

Compensation awarded for unfair dismissal
Compensation awarded for unlawful deduction from wages

About this LexChat collection

Publisher and coverage

LexChat is published by Esheria. Coverage reflects the case law currently mapped from identified source collections; it may be incomplete, delayed, or later corrected. The official source controls where it differs from this research page.

AI and research method

Source-derived facts are shown separately from AI-generated material. If an AI summary is available, it is explicitly labelled and remains a non-authoritative research aid.

Corrections and reporting

Report a source mismatch, factual issue, personal-data concern, or licensing question to support@esheria.co.ke. Include this page's URL and the supporting official source so the record can be reviewed, corrected, restricted, or withdrawn.

Legal-information disclaimer

LexChat provides legal information and research tools, not legal advice. Verify currency, status, citations, and jurisdiction with authoritative sources and a qualified professional where appropriate.