Emblaze Mobility Solutions Ltd v Revenue & Customs [2010] UKFTT 410 (TC) (25 August 2010)
The Tribunal found that, on the facts, there was no evidence of circularity of goods or money, and that Global did not know nor should have known that its transactions were connected with fraudulent VAT evasion. The appeal was allowed and the input tax denial was overturned.
- Citation
- [2010] UKFTT 410 (TC)
- Parties
- Appellant: Emblaze Mobility Solutions Ltd; Respondents: The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (VAT)
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 25 August 2010
- Procedural Posture
- VAT Appeal (mtic Fraud) / First Tier Tribunal (tax) Final Decision
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Input Tax Denial, MTIC Fraud, Kittel Principle, Due Diligence, Repayment Claims
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Emblaze Mobility Solutions Ltd
Appellant
The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (VAT)
Respondents
Procedural Posture
VAT Appeal (mtic Fraud) / First Tier Tribunal (tax) Final Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Global (now Emblaze) knew or should have known its transactions were connected with fraudulent evasion of VAT
- 2 Whether HMRC was correct to deny input tax of £8,790,869 for 33 mobile phone transactions in period 03/06
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal found that, on the facts, there was no evidence of circularity of goods or money, and that Global did not know nor should have known that its transactions were connected with fraudulent VAT evasion. The appeal was allowed and the input tax denial was overturned.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- HMRC's denial of £8,790,869 input tax for period 03/06 is overturned.
- Assessment for net VAT payable of £345,218.31 is set aside.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment