Onillon v Revenue and Customs (INCOME TAX/CORPORATION TAX : Penalty) [2018] UKFTT 33 (TC) (30 January 2018)
The Tribunal found that although the appellant did not take the formal corrective action required by the follower notice, it was reasonable in all the circumstances for him not to have done so. The appellant relied on advice from his accountant, who contacted HMRC and was told no further action was required. The...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2018] UKFTT 33 (TC)
- Parties
- Appellant: Emmanuel Onillon; Respondents: The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 30 January 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Income Tax/corporation Tax Penalty Appeal / First Tier Tribunal (tax) Substantive Decision
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Follower Notice Penalty, Finance Act 2014, Reasonable Excuse, Corrective Action, Tax Avoidance Schemes
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Emmanuel Onillon
Appellant
The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Income Tax/corporation Tax Penalty Appeal / First Tier Tribunal (tax) Substantive Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appellant failed to take necessary corrective action in response to a follower notice under the Finance Act 2014
- 2 Whether it was reasonable in all the circumstances for the appellant not to take corrective action
- 3 Whether the penalty imposed was correctly calculated and whether further reduction for cooperation was warranted
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal found that although the appellant did not take the formal corrective action required by the follower notice, it was reasonable in all the circumstances for him not to have done so. The appellant relied on advice from his accountant, who contacted HMRC and was told no further action was required. The Tribunal accepted this evidence and concluded that the appellant acted reasonably, thus the penalty should not be imposed.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- The penalty assessment of £78,026.76 is cancelled.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment