Mr P Jamieson and Others v Engenera Renewables Ltd -“ in administration and Secretary of State for Trade and Business (England and Wales : Protective Award) [2025] UKET 2501309/2024 (12 May 2025)

The tribunal found that Engenera Renewables Ltd failed to comply with its statutory duty to consult, and the claimants are entitled to a protective award.

Source-derived case information.

Citation: [2025] UKET 2501309/2024
Parties: Claimant: Mr P Jamieson and Others; Respondent: Engenera Renewables Ltd (in administration); Respondent: Secretary of State for Trade and Business
Jurisdiction: United Kingdom
Judgment Date: 12 May 2025
Procedural Posture: Employment Tribunal / Judgment on Protective Award
Outcome: Protective award granted in favour of claimants.
Legal Topics: Protective Award, Collective Redundancy, Consultation Obligations

Employment Law Protective Award Collective Redundancy Consultation Obligations

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2

Parties

Mr P Jamieson and Others

Claimant

Engenera Renewables Ltd (in administration)

Respondent

Secretary of State for Trade and Business

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Tribunal / Judgment on Protective Award

Legal Issues

1 Whether Engenera Renewables Ltd failed to consult employees as required before redundancies
2 Whether claimants are entitled to a protective award

Ratio Decidendi

The tribunal found that Engenera Renewables Ltd failed to comply with its statutory duty to consult, and the claimants are entitled to a protective award.

Court Disposition

Protective award granted in favour of claimants.

Orders

Engenera Renewables Ltd to pay a protective award to the claimants for failure to consult.

About this LexChat collection

Publisher and coverage

LexChat is published by Esheria. Coverage reflects the case law currently mapped from identified source collections; it may be incomplete, delayed, or later corrected. The official source controls where it differs from this research page.

AI and research method

Source-derived facts are shown separately from AI-generated material. If an AI summary is available, it is explicitly labelled and remains a non-authoritative research aid.

Corrections and reporting

Report a source mismatch, factual issue, personal-data concern, or licensing question to support@esheria.co.ke. Include this page's URL and the supporting official source so the record can be reviewed, corrected, restricted, or withdrawn.

Legal-information disclaimer

LexChat provides legal information and research tools, not legal advice. Verify currency, status, citations, and jurisdiction with authoritative sources and a qualified professional where appropriate.