VA226992012 VA227002012 VA227012012 VA227022012 (unreported) [2013] UKAITUR VA226992012 (22 April 2013)

VA226992012 VA227002012 VA227012012 VA227022012 (unreported) [2013] UKAITUR VA226992012 (22 April 2013)

The Upper Tribunal found that the First-tier Tribunal made a material error of law in its assessment of the evidence and the application of the Immigration Rules, and set aside the decision.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2013] UKAITUR VA226992012
Parties
Appellants: VA22699/2012, VA22700/2012, VA22701/2012, VA22702/2012; Respondent: Entry Clearance Officer
Jurisdiction
United Kingdom
Judgment Date
22 April 2013
Procedural Posture
Immigration Appeal / Appeal From First Tier Tribunal to Upper Tribunal
Outcome
appeal allowed
Legal Topics
Entry Clearance, Visit Visa Refusal, Appeal Procedure
Immigration Law Entry Clearance Visit Visa Refusal Appeal Procedure

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

VA22699/2012, VA22700/2012, VA22701/2012, VA22702/2012

Appellants

Entry Clearance Officer

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Immigration Appeal / Appeal From First Tier Tribunal to Upper Tribunal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the First-tier Tribunal erred in law in dismissing the appellants' appeals against refusal of visit visas

Ratio Decidendi

The Upper Tribunal found that the First-tier Tribunal made a material error of law in its assessment of the evidence and the application of the Immigration Rules, and set aside the decision.

Court Disposition

appeal allowed

Orders

  • The decision of the First-tier Tribunal is set aside.
  • The appeals are remitted to the First-tier Tribunal for a fresh hearing.