OA148652013 [2014] UKAITUR OA148652013 (9 July 2014)

OA148652013 [2014] UKAITUR OA148652013 (9 July 2014)

The appeal was dismissed because the claimant failed to provide the specified evidence of the sponsor's income in Australia or sufficient savings as required by Appendix FM-SE, and a job offer in the UK alone was not sufficient to meet the financial requirements.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2014] UKAITUR OA148652013
Parties
Appellant: Entry Clearance Officer; Respondent/claimant: Mr Grant Loxton
Jurisdiction
United Kingdom
Judgment Date
09 July 2014
Procedural Posture
Immigration Appeal / Upper Tribunal Appeal From First Tier Tribunal
Outcome
appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Entry Clearance, Financial Requirements for Spouse Visa, Appendix FM SE, Specified Evidence, Income Threshold
Immigration Law Entry Clearance Financial Requirements for Spouse Visa Appendix FM SE Specified Evidence Income Threshold

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 6
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Entry Clearance Officer

Appellant

Mr Grant Loxton

Respondent/claimant

Procedural Posture

Immigration Appeal / Upper Tribunal Appeal From First Tier Tribunal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the claimant provided specified evidence to meet the financial requirements for entry clearance as a spouse under Appendix FM of the Immigration Rules
  2. 2 Whether a job offer in the UK alone suffices to meet the requirements without evidence of overseas income or sufficient savings

Ratio Decidendi

The appeal was dismissed because the claimant failed to provide the specified evidence of the sponsor's income in Australia or sufficient savings as required by Appendix FM-SE, and a job offer in the UK alone was not sufficient to meet the financial requirements.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Decision of the First-tier Tribunal set aside
  • Appeal against refusal of entry clearance dismissed