EA136622021 & EA136502021 [2023] UKAITUR EA136622021 (20 February 2023)

The second appellant's appeal is allowed as the respondent accepted she met all requirements for a family permit under Appendix EU. The first appellant's appeal remains extant as his withdrawal was rescinded before Tribunal consent.

Citation: [2023] UKAITUR EA136622021
Parties: First Appellant: Mr Nicco Addio Ray Eddie; Second Appellant: Miss Stinna Akosu Eddie; Respondent: Entry Clearance Officer
Jurisdiction: United Kingdom
Judgment Date: 20 February 2023
Procedural Posture: Immigration Appeal / Upper Tribunal Re Making of Decision After Error of Law Found
Outcome: Second appellant's appeal allowed; first appellant's appeal to proceed to resumed hearing
Legal Topics: Family Permit, Appendix EU, Withdrawal of Appeal, Remaking of Decision

Immigration Law Family Permit Appendix EU Withdrawal of Appeal Remaking of Decision

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2

Parties

Mr Nicco Addio Ray Eddie

First Appellant

Miss Stinna Akosu Eddie

Second Appellant

Entry Clearance Officer

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Immigration Appeal / Upper Tribunal Re Making of Decision After Error of Law Found

Legal Issues

1 Whether the second appellant meets the requirements for a family permit under Appendix EU
2 Effect of withdrawal and rescinding of withdrawal by the first appellant

Ratio Decidendi

Court Disposition

Second appellant's appeal allowed; first appellant's appeal to proceed to resumed hearing

Orders

The appeal of Miss Akosu Eddie is allowed
The appeal of Mr Nicco Addio Ray Eddie will proceed to a resumed hearing