UI2023002187 & Ors [2025] UKAITUR UI2023002187 (8 May 2025)
The First-tier Tribunal materially erred in law by allowing the appeal under Appendix EU (Family Permit) on the basis of Zambrano rights, as such rights were not available to entry clearance applicants outside the UK after the repeal of the Immigration (EEA) Regulations 2016. The Akinsanya litigation did not extend...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2025] UKAITUR UI2023002187
- Parties
- Appellant: Entry Clearance Officer; Respondent: Bibi Bashir; Respondent: Bilal Ahmed Bashir; Respondent: Bibi Zhara Bashir; Respondent: Hilal Ahmed Bashir
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 08 May 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Immigration Appeal / Upper Tribunal Appeal Against First Tier Tribunal Decision
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- EU Settlement Scheme, Zambrano Carers, Appendix EU (family Permit), Immigration (eea) Regulations 2016, Article 8 ECHR
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Entry Clearance Officer
Appellant
Bibi Bashir
Respondent
Bilal Ahmed Bashir
Respondent
Bibi Zhara Bashir
Respondent
Hilal Ahmed Bashir
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Immigration Appeal / Upper Tribunal Appeal Against First Tier Tribunal Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the First-tier Tribunal erred in law by allowing the appeal under Appendix EU (Family Permit) based on Zambrano rights after the repeal of the Immigration (EEA) Regulations 2016
- 2 Whether the Akinsanya litigation or policy extended Zambrano rights to entry clearance applicants outside the UK after 31 December 2020
- 3 Whether Article 8 ECHR was a live issue in the appeal
Ratio Decidendi
The First-tier Tribunal materially erred in law by allowing the appeal under Appendix EU (Family Permit) on the basis of Zambrano rights, as such rights were not available to entry clearance applicants outside the UK after the repeal of the Immigration (EEA) Regulations 2016. The Akinsanya litigation did not extend to this scenario, and Article 8 ECHR was not a live issue in the appeal before the Tribunal.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- The First-tier Tribunal's decision allowing the appeals is set aside for error of law.
- The appeals are dismissed on re-making by the Upper Tribunal.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment