Ari v. PDA (Training) Ltd [2000] UKEAT 137_00_0504 (5 April 2000)

Ari v. PDA (Training) Ltd [2000] UKEAT 137_00_0504 (5 April 2000)

The appeal was dismissed because the appellant did not make a complaint of sexual harassment or any other protected act under the Sex Discrimination Act before the alleged act of victimisation (constructive dismissal), and no error of law was found in the Tribunal's decision.

Citation
[2000] UKEAT 137_00_0504
Parties
Appellant: Eren Ari; Respondent: PDA (Training) Ltd
Jurisdiction
United Kingdom
Judgment Date
05 April 2000
Procedural Posture
Employment Tribunal Appeal / Preliminary Hearing on Appeal
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Victimisation, Sex Discrimination, Constructive Dismissal, Error of Law
Employment Law Discrimination Law Victimisation Sex Discrimination Constructive Dismissal Error of Law

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Eren Ari

Appellant

PDA (Training) Ltd

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Tribunal Appeal / Preliminary Hearing on Appeal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the Employment Tribunal erred in law in rejecting the claim of victimisation under the Sex Discrimination Act 1975
  2. 2 Whether the appellant made a protected act under section 4 of the Sex Discrimination Act prior to the alleged victimisation

Ratio Decidendi

The appeal was dismissed because the appellant did not make a complaint of sexual harassment or any other protected act under the Sex Discrimination Act before the alleged act of victimisation (constructive dismissal), and no error of law was found in the Tribunal's decision.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Appeal is dismissed at the preliminary hearing stage.