Mr R Gibbs Taylor v Espo Ltd (England and Wales : Breach of Contract) [2019] UKET 2401603/2019 (27 March 2019)

The tribunal found that Espo Ltd breached the employment contract with Mr R Gibbs Taylor.

Source-derived case information.

Citation: [2019] UKET 2401603/2019
Parties: Claimant: Mr R Gibbs Taylor; Respondent: Espo Ltd
Jurisdiction: United Kingdom
Judgment Date: 27 March 2019
Procedural Posture: Employment Tribunal / Final Judgment
Outcome: Judgment for claimant
Legal Topics: Breach of Contract

Employment Law Breach of Contract

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1

Parties

Mr R Gibbs Taylor

Claimant

Espo Ltd

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Tribunal / Final Judgment

Legal Issues

1 Whether Espo Ltd breached the employment contract with Mr R Gibbs Taylor

Ratio Decidendi

The tribunal found that Espo Ltd breached the employment contract with Mr R Gibbs Taylor.

Court Disposition

Judgment for claimant

Orders

Espo Ltd to pay compensation to Mr R Gibbs Taylor for breach of contract

About this LexChat collection

Publisher and coverage

LexChat is published by Esheria. Coverage reflects the case law currently mapped from identified source collections; it may be incomplete, delayed, or later corrected. The official source controls where it differs from this research page.

AI and research method

Source-derived facts are shown separately from AI-generated material. If an AI summary is available, it is explicitly labelled and remains a non-authoritative research aid.

Corrections and reporting

Report a source mismatch, factual issue, personal-data concern, or licensing question to support@esheria.co.ke. Include this page's URL and the supporting official source so the record can be reviewed, corrected, restricted, or withdrawn.

Legal-information disclaimer

LexChat provides legal information and research tools, not legal advice. Verify currency, status, citations, and jurisdiction with authoritative sources and a qualified professional where appropriate.