Mr T Chapman v Essential Nutrition Ltd (England and Wales : Breach of Contract : Redundancy : Unfair Dismissal : Unlawful Deduction from Wages : Working Time Regulations) [2017] UKET 1800181/2016 (21 September 2017)
The tribunal found that the claimant was unfairly dismissed as the redundancy was not genuine and proper procedures were not followed. There were also unlawful deductions from wages and breaches of the Working Time Regulations.
- Citation
- [2017] UKET 1800181/2016
- Parties
- Claimant: Mr T Chapman; Respondent: Essential Nutrition Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 21 September 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Tribunal / Judgment
- Outcome
- Claim upheld in part
- Legal Topics
- Breach of Contract, Redundancy, Unfair Dismissal, Unlawful Deduction From Wages, Working Time Regulations
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mr T Chapman
Claimant
Essential Nutrition Ltd
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Tribunal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the claimant was unfairly dismissed
- 2 Whether there was a breach of contract
- 3 Whether redundancy was genuine
Ratio Decidendi
The tribunal found that the claimant was unfairly dismissed as the redundancy was not genuine and proper procedures were not followed. There were also unlawful deductions from wages and breaches of the Working Time Regulations.
Court Disposition
Claim upheld in part
Orders
- Respondent to pay compensation for unfair dismissal
- Respondent to pay sums for unlawful deduction from wages
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment