Miss M Yusuf v Estee Lauder Cosmetics Ltd (England and Wales : Public Interest Disclosure : Unfair Dismissal) [2017] UKET 1801220/2017 (22 September 2017)
The tribunal found that the principal reason for the claimant's dismissal was her protected disclosure, rendering the dismissal automatically unfair under the relevant statutory provisions.
- Citation
- [2017] UKET 1801220/2017
- Parties
- Claimant: Miss M Yusuf; Respondent: Estee Lauder Cosmetics Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 22 September 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Tribunal / Judgment
- Outcome
- Claim upheld
- Legal Topics
- Public Interest Disclosure, Unfair Dismissal
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Parties
Miss M Yusuf
Claimant
Estee Lauder Cosmetics Ltd
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Tribunal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the claimant was unfairly dismissed for making a protected disclosure under the Public Interest Disclosure Act 1998
Ratio Decidendi
The tribunal found that the principal reason for the claimant's dismissal was her protected disclosure, rendering the dismissal automatically unfair under the relevant statutory provisions.
Court Disposition
Claim upheld
Orders
- The respondent is ordered to pay compensation to the claimant for unfair dismissal.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment